
Take a look at our Periodic Minimal Surfaces Image Gallery

Important events have recently taken place in structural crystallography. First, the rigid concept of a “perfect crystal” has been relaxed to embrace more general structures, such as
quasicrystals.[1] Second, an advance has been made from the classical geometry of coordination polyhedra to threedimensional differential geometry. The decisive step in this direction has been the use of curved surfaces in describing a great variety of
structures.[2]
The essence of the key concept of a minimal surface is as follows. When a wire frame is dipped into soapy water, a thin film is formed. Surface tension minimizes the energy of the film, which is proportional to its surface area. As a result, the film has the smallest area consistent with the shape of the frame and with the requirement that the mean curvature of the film be zero at every point. If a minimal surface has space group symmetry, it is periodic in three independent directions.
Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) are of special interest, because they appear in a variety of real structures such as silicates, bicontinuous mixtures, lyotropic colloids, detergent films, lipid bilayers and biological
formations.[311] For example, the interface between single calcite crystals and amorphous organic matter in the skeletal element in sea urchins is described by the P minimal
surface.[6,7] TPMS are omnipresent in the natural and manmade worlds, and provide a concise description of many seemingly unrelated
structures.[12] They have become of interest not only to the structural chemist, but also the
biologist,[7] structural engineer and materials scientist,[13] and are echoed in art and architecture.14 The Schwarz P surface is found in the ternary mixtures of oil, water and surfactant, in the zeolite sodalite
and in the perovskitetype structure of.[3] These selfassembled structures are templates in the inorganic and organic polymerisation reactions which lead to mesoporous molecular
sieves[15,16] and to contact lens materials.[17] Atoms in numerous zeolites lie on minimal
surfaces.[11,18,19] Further structures which are related to minimal surfaces are cristobalite, diamond, quartz, ice, W3Fe3C (cutting steel), starch and N6F15, and many properties of these solids stem from this fact. TPMS may even have applications in cosmology as membranes (or “branes”).[20]
It is imperative that the TPMS be properly examined in the practical context. They offer a unique way of expressing collective laws and strategies for understanding the larger correlations between related structures with potential for applications in molecular and materials design. We are confident that we shall soon be able to describe, quantify and predict transformation pathways in regular structures, such as phase transitions in silicates and catastrophic phase changes in oilwater mixtures.
The application of minimal surfaces to the physical world has so far been descriptive, rather than quantitative. The reason for this is that it was thought that the parameters of minimal surfaces could not be calculated analytically, while numerical calculations were inaccurate and consumed vast amounts of computer time. A surface element of an infinite surface was calculated by numerical integration, and larger portions constructed by combining the elements. We have been able to derive explicit, analytical, general equations for the parameters of triplyperiodic minimal surfaces, which led to the discovery of important new
properties.[2132] Accurate calculations can now be easily carried out using a personal computer.
The coordinates of points lying on minimal surfaces are described in terms of integrals involving the (“Weierstrass”) function of the form
where and
are parameters which fully describe the surface. A method for the derivation of the Weierstrass function for a given type of surface has been
developed[33,34] which generates different families of minimal surfaces from the above equation. For example,
and
gives the famous D (“diamond”) surface.
It was thought that the Weierstrass integration could not be performed analytically. However, via a rigorous procedure, we were able to express these integrals in terms of standard functions, and gave explicit general equations for the
coordinates.[2132] The wellknown properties of the functions appearing in the solution provide new insights into the features of minimal surfaces, and permit their systematic calculation. The values of the coordinates calculated from the equations are finite everywhere, even at points for which the polynomial under the square root is equal to zero. This has been a major obstacle to numerical calculations, particularly since the most interesting parts of a minimal surface occur in the near vicinity of such singularities. We gave the limiting values of all important quantities characterizing the surfaces, expressed the aspect ratio c/a and the surfacetovolume ratio in terms of the two parameters, and listed the exact coordinates. As a byproduct, we have solved important mathematical problems not directly related to minimal surfaces. Some of them relate to optimization theory using the method called Taboo
Search.[35] Others, known as “special functions”, are already being implemented in commercial software packages.
Minimal surfaces are found in soap films, in assemblies of lipid layers in contact with water and in lyotropic
colloids.[3638] However, the structure of such liquid mixtures is difficult to study quantitatively. The breakthrough came with the discovery of a new family of mesoporous silicas synthesised in watersurfactant mixtures. These solid
materials,[15,39] the structure of which mimics the liquidliquid minimal surface, have dramatically expanded the range of crystallographically defined pore sizes from the micropore (< 13 Ĺ) to the mesopore (20 to 100 Ĺ) regime. The synthesis uses ordered arrays of surfactant molecules as a “template” for the threedimensional polymerization of silicates. The mesoporous materials obtained in this way exhibit several remarkable features: (i) welldefined pore size and shape; (ii) fine adjustability of the pore size; (iii) high thermal and hydrolytic stability; and (iv) a very high degree of pore ordering over micrometer length scales. These properties result directly from the interplay between organized arrays of surfactant molecules and silicate species in the aqueous phase. Since the number of possible surfactants which can be used is virtually limitless, many different minimal surfaces can be readily prepared. The cubic mesophase is the
same[40] as the phase found in the watercetyltrimethylammonium bromide
system.[41] The midplane of the silicate wall lies on the G minimal surface. Such a structure can be viewed as a single infinite silicate sheet which separates the surfactant species into two equal and disconnected volumes. It is advantageous for the silicate wall to occupy a periodic minimal surface, because it can then maximize the wall thickness for a given surfactant/SiO2 volume fraction.
Brenner
et al.[42] have used periodic nodal surfaces, closely related to TPMS, for direct structure determination from powder Xray diffraction data. Given just a few strong lowindex reflections, a periodic nodal surface which divides the unit cell into regions of high and low electron density, is generated. Fourteen known zeolite structures were examined to verify the validity of the procedure, and in all cases the framework atoms were found to lie on just one side of the calculated curved surface. In other words, the surface defines a structure envelope. The same approach was successfully applied to ionic and organic structures. Since these reflections, with large dspacings, are precisely the ones that are least likely to be involved in overlap in a powder diffraction pattern, such surfaces can also be calculated using powder data. The resulting restriction in the region of the asymmetric unit in which atoms are likely to be found has immediate implications for any of the directspace methods of structure determination from powder data. The use of this structure envelope as a mask in a straightforward grid search procedure reduced the computer time required to solve several framework structures by as much as two orders of magnitude.
Ordered graphitic foams related to fullerenes and crystalline mesoporous oxides
Mackay and Terrones[4345] have predicted the existence of a new kind of ordered graphite foams, related to fullerenes, with topologies of triply periodic minimal surfaces likely to be found. We have also shown this to be possible for MCMtype materials, and an example of an energy minimised crystalline form of MCM48 has been
demonstrated.[46] These new structures, which are of great practical interest, are constructed by introducing 8membered rings of carbon atoms into a sheet of 6membered rings, thus giving saddleshaped surfaces. The existence of such rings has been confirmed by electron
microscopy,[47,48] and curved graphitic foams are present in “fouled” molecular sieve catalysts. The study of ordered periodic foams as 2D manifolds, not only for graphite but for other materials, will open the possibility of new kinds of structures with novel properties.
Potential applications of periodic minimal surfaces in engineering, as highstrength structural elements, heat exchangers and sound absorbers, can only be assessed if proper solid
threedimensional models are constructed. In the past, models were made by putting together small sections of the surface, which is unsatisfactory for engineering purposes. Polymer models are being made in Cambridge by stereolithography.
[1] 
Shechtman, D. S.,
Blech, I., Gratias, D. & Cahn, J. W.
Metallic phase with long range orientational order and no translational
symmetry.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 19511953 (1984).

[2] 
Mackay, A. L.
Report on the Workshop on Aperiodic Crystals held at Les Houches, France,
on March 1020, 1986.
Int. J. Rapid Solidification 2, 163164 (1986).

[3] 
von
Schnering, H. G. & Nesper, R.
How nature adapts chemical structures to curved surfaces.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 26, 10591080 (1987).

[4] 
Mackay, A. L. & Klinowski, J.
in Symmetry: Unifying Human Understanding 803 (Pergamon, 1986).

[5] 
Mackay, A. L. & Klinowski, J.
Towards a grammar of inorganic structure.
Computers and Mathematics with Applications B12, 803824 (1986).

[6] 
Donnay, G. & Pawson, D. L.
Xray diffraction studies of echinoderm plates.
Science 166, 11471150 (1969).

[7] 
Nissen, H. U.
Crystal orientation and plate structure in echinoid skeletal units.
Science 166, 11501152 (1969).

[8] 
Scriven, L. E.
Equilibrium bicontinuous structure.
Nature 263, 123125 (1976).

[9] 
Mackay, A. L.
Equipotential surfaces in periodic charge distributions.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 27, 849850 (1988).

[10] 
Andersson, S.
On the description of complex inorganic crystal structures.
Angew. Chem. Intern. Ed. Engl. 22, 6981 (1983).

[11] 
Andersson, S., Hyde, S. T. & von Schnering, H. G.
The intrinsic curvature of solids.
Z. Kristallogr. 168, 117 (1984).

[12] 
Hyde, S., Andersson, S., Larsson, K., Blum, Z., Landh, T., Lidin, S. & Ninham, B. W.
The Language of Shape. The Role of Curvature in Condensed Matter: Physics, Chemistry and Biology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997).

[13] 
Almgren, F. J.
Minimal surface forms.
The Mathematical Intelligencer 4, 164172 (1982).

[14] 
Kemp, M.
Gabo's geometry.
Nature 389, 919 (1997).

[15] 
Kresge, C. T., Leonowicz, M. E., Roth, W. J., Vartuli, J. C. & Beck, J. S.
Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid crystal template mechanism.
Nature 359, 710712 (1992).

[16] 
Davis, M. E.
Materials science: organizing for better synthesis.
Nature 364, 391393 (1993).

[17] 
Anderson, D. M. & Ström, P.
Polymerized lyotropic liquid crystals as contact lens materials.
Physica A176, 151167 (1991).

[18] 
Andersson, S., Hyde, S. T., Larsson, K. & Lidin, S.
Minimal surfaces and structures: from inorganic and metal crystals to cell membranes and biopolymers.
Chem. Rev. 88, 221242 (1988).

[19] 
Alfredsson, V., Anderson, M. W., Ohsuna, T., Terasaki, O., Jacob, M. & Bojrup, M.
Cubosome description of the inorganic mesoporous structure MCM48.
Chem. Mater. 9, 20662070 (1997).

[20] 
Pease, R.
Brane new world.
Nature 411, 986988 (2001).

[21] 
Cvijovic´, D. & Klinowski, J.
The T family and CLP family of triply periodic minimal surfaces. 1. Derivation of parametric equations.
Journal de Physique (Paris) I 2, 137147 (1992).

[22] 
Cvijovic´, D. & Klinowski, J.
The T and CLP families of triply periodic minimal surfaces. 2. The properties and computation of T surfaces.
Journal de Physique (Paris) I 2, 21912205 (1992).

[23] 
Cvijovic´, D. & Klinowski, J.
The T and CLP families of triply periodic minimal surfaces. 3. The properties and computation of CLP surfaces.
Journal de Physique (Paris) I 2, 22072220 (1992).

[24] 
Cvijovic´, D. & Klinowski, J.
The oCLP family of triply periodic minimal surfaces.
Journal de Physique (Paris) I 3, 909924 (1993).

[25] 
Cvijovic´, D. & Klinowski, J.
The computation of the triply periodic IWP minimal surface.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 226, 9399 (1994).

[26] 
Gandy, P. J. F., Cvijovic´, D., Mackay, A. L. & Klinowski, J.
Exact computation of the triply periodic D ('diamond') minimal surface.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 314, 543551 (1999).

[27] 
Gandy, P. J. F. & Klinowski, J.
Exact computation of the triply periodic Schwarz P minimal surface.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 322, 579586 (2000).

[28] 
Gandy, P. J. F. & Klinowski, J.
Exact computation of the triply periodic G ('Gyroid') minimal surface.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 321, 363371 (2000).

[29] 
Gandy, P. J. F., Bardhan, S., Mackay, A. L. & Klinowski, J.
Nodal surface approximations to the P, G, D and IWP triply periodic minimal surfaces.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 336, 187195 (2001).

[30] 
Gandy, P. J. F. & Klinowski, J.
On the equipotential surfaces of cubic lattices.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 360, 543551 (2002).

[31] 
Gandy, P. J. F. & Klinowski, J.
Nodal surface approximations to the zero equipotential surfaces for cubic lattices.
J. Math. Chem. 31, 116 (2002).

[32] 
Gandy, P. J. F. & Klinowski, J.
Geometric quantization of curvature energy in equipotential surfaces of ionic crystals.
J. Chem. Phys. 116, 94319434 (2002).

[33] 
Lidin, S. & Hyde, S. T.
A construction algorithm for minimal surfaces.
Journal de Physique (Paris) 48, 15851590 (1987).

[34] 
Lidin, S., Hyde, S. T. & Ninham, B. W.
Exact construction of periodic minimal surfaces: the IWP surface and its isometries.
Journal de Physique (Paris) 51, 801813 (1990).

[35] 
Cvijovic´, D. & Klinowski, J.
Taboo Search – an approach to the multiple minima problem.
Science 267, 664666 (1995).

[36] 
Charvolin, J. & Sadoc, J. F.
Periodic systems of frustrated fluid films and bicontinuous cubic structures in liquid crystals.
Journal de Physique (Paris) 48, 15591569 (1987).

[37] 
Gozdz, W. & Holyst, R.
From the Plateau problem to periodic minimal surfaces in lipids, surfactants and diblock copolymers.
Macromolecular Theory and Simulations 5, 321332 (1996).

[38] 
Alfredsson, V. & Anderson, M. W.
Structure of MCM48 revealed by transmission electron microscopy.
Chem. Mat. 8, 11411146 (1996).

[39] 
Beck, J. S., Vartuli, J. C., Roth, W. J., Leonowicz, M. E., Kresge, C. T., Schmitt, K. D., Chu, C. T. W., Olson, D. H., Sheppard, E. W., McCullen, S. B., Higgins, J. B. & Schlenker, J. L.
A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 1083410843 (1992).

[40] 
Monnier, A., Schüth, F., Huo, Q., Kumar, D., Margolese, D., Maxwell, R. S., Stucky, G. D., Krishnamurty, M., Petroff, P., Firouzi, A., Janicke, M. & Chmelka, B. F.
Cooperative formation of inorganicorganic interfaces in the synthesis of silicate mesostructures.
Science 261, 12991303 (1993).

[41] 
Charvolin, J. & Sadoc, J. F.
Cubic phases as structures of disclinations.
Colloid Polym. Sci. 268, 190195 (1990).

[42] 
Brenner, S., McCusker, L. B. & Bärlocher, C.
Using a structure envelope to facilitate structure solution from powder diffraction data.
J. Appl. Crystallogr. 30, 11671172 (1997).

[43] 
Mackay, A. L. & Terrones, H.
Diamond from graphite.
Nature 352, 762762 (1991).

[44] 
Terrones, H. & Mackay, A. L.
Negatively curved graphite and triply periodic minimal surfaces.
J. Math. Chem. 15, 183195 (1994).

[45] 
Terrones, H. & Mackay, A. L.
From C60 to negatively curved graphite.
Progress In Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials
34, 2536 (1997).

[46] 
Anderson, M. W., Jackson, C. L. & Luigi, D. P.
in Proc. 12th International Zeolite Conference, Baltimore (ed. Treacy, M. M. J.) 697704 (Materials Research Society, 1998).

[47] 
Iijima, S.
Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon.
Nature 354, 5658 (1991).

[48] 
Iijima, S., Ichihashi, T. & Ando, Y.
Pentagons, heptagons and negative curvature in graphite microtubule growth.
Nature 356, 776778 (1992).

